![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 Agreed. The more the better. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 @andyashton LOCAH looks good from my quick perusal. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 I wasn't arguing about closed/open world. It's the expectation that some properties are present when the query is written. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 @andyashton Sort of. An ontology gives you an expectation of the properties that will be present in a given class. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @andyashton @azaroth42 Might be a bit of wheel re-invention going on in there. (ducking erasers and angry mobs) | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 @andyashton Agreed. But I worry that people think this means a mashup of vocabularies. Serendipitous parsing is painful. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | RT @azaroth42: @andyashton @muninn_project Totally agree. Need requirements from LAM side and expertise/design from LOD side. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @andyashton @azaroth42 @rdhyee Possible. Through hard core ontologies aren't any better. Un-parsable literals are a waste of time. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 modsrdf:partLevel "v.2, no. 3" :( | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 @rdhyee Duplication of classes is not a bad thing unless you don't provide equivalencies. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 @rdhyee You remember my rant about Dublin Core: the first one able to markup journal papers and books in RDF sanely gets my vote. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @azaroth42 I'm still willing to give #BIBFRAME a chance. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @pabinkley Please re-read my tweet. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | "[Canadianna] does not provide for digital public access to the [LAC ] documents without a paywall" http://t.co/V0xMWTavAn | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @Labville Why not? "I drank coffee with @Labville" is a ringing endorsement in my book! | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @mjsuhonos @redlibrarian http://t.co/Fx8rktlwjI | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @iddux @mjsuhonos Scientist doesn't always mean Engineer doesn't always mean Scholar or tool builder; different success metric in time/place | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @redlibrarian Be afraid! | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @redlibrarian Funny, you're the second person to mention that... | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |
![]() |
muninn_project | @muninn_project | Follow | @mjsuhonos @chrpr Working on it. | 7 years 3 months ago | Reply Retweet Favorite |