Tweets by @muninn_project
-
-
-
@azaroth42 I wasn't arguing about closed/open world. It's the expectation that some properties are present when the query is written.
-
@azaroth42 @andyashton Sort of. An ontology gives you an expectation of the properties that will be present in a given class.
-
@andyashton @azaroth42 Might be a bit of wheel re-invention going on in there. (ducking erasers and angry mobs)
-
@azaroth42 @andyashton Agreed. But I worry that people think this means a mashup of vocabularies. Serendipitous parsing is painful.
-
RT @azaroth42: @andyashton @muninn_project Totally agree. Need requirements from LAM side and expertise/design from LOD side.
-
@andyashton @azaroth42 @rdhyee Possible. Through hard core ontologies aren't any better. Un-parsable literals are a waste of time.
-
-
@azaroth42 @rdhyee Duplication of classes is not a bad thing unless you don't provide equivalencies.
-
@azaroth42 @rdhyee You remember my rant about Dublin Core: the first one able to markup journal papers and books in RDF sanely gets my vote.
-
-
-
"[Canadianna] does not provide for digital public access to the [LAC ] documents without a paywall" http://t.co/V0xMWTavAn
-
-
@iddux @mjsuhonos Scientist doesn't always mean Engineer doesn't always mean Scholar or tool builder; different success metric in time/place
-
-
@redlibrarian Funny, you're the second person to mention that...
-